this is a video reflection assignment about the stigma of mental illness. please watch the attached video link (56 minutes and 45 sec) and instructions and write a two-page double-spaced reflection.
https://www.pbs.org/video/kvie-documentaries-new-state-mind-ending-stigma-mental-illness/
Author: admin
Categories
STAYING ETHICAL
Briefly summarize the Hart City scenario and Dr. Khabirov’s past research.
Describe the ethical issues related to working with participants, bias, and/or power imbalance you saw in the scenario.
Use resources to support your description and explanation of the ethical issues.
Explain how you can mitigate the risks of working with participants while conducting action research.
source
Stringer, E. T., & Ortiz Aragón, A. (2021). Theoretical foundations of action research. In Action research (5th ed., pp. 43–81). SAGE Publications, Inc.
IfD_Qualitative Research Specialists. (2020, August 9). Action research in development| Action research example Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns7S-N4_aJ0
Hi, there are Three (3) assignments. Assignment One(1) has the questionnaire and the article. Please let me know if you are not understanding something. Pages are to be divided and happy new year. Thank you
Categories
writing proposal
The final essay will require you to summarize the chosen essay (see options below), identify the author’s point of view (argument/thesis), describe a writing strategy that the author uses and state whether it is effective or not and why. You must include examples by quoting the original text. This analysis should be written in 3rd person point of view.
In addition, you will compose a response to the essay, an Author’s Response (you are the author). In your response, you will state your position on the topic and whether you agree with argument or not. You will find one source that is related to the topic, that provides additional perspective that can support your position whether it be the same point of view as the essay or an opposing view. You must include either a direct quote or paraphrase from the resource you have found in your research. The Author’s Response can be written in 1st person point of view.
Select one of the following three articles as the topic of your essay (located in the Norton Field Guide textbook):
“Our Blind Spot About Guns”, Nicholas Kristof, p. 177
“Representation of Disney Princesses in the Media,” Isabelle Gill, p. 759
“Outbreak of the Irrational, Sarah Dzubay,” p. 825
Categories
Not Wanted on the Voyage SCRIPT
Please take a look at the files attached to this order. No citations are needed. No need to do the recording part, your only job is to produce the SCRIPT for me to read out loud for recording as outlined in the files attached. You may need to do some reading on the book, Not Wanted on the Voyage by Timothy Findley. I need quality work. I mean QUALITY and only QUALITY. Finally, I will be reading this out loud to the class AND recording this for the teacher, so keep that in mind and stage your work appropriately for that setting, if you will.
Categories
Assignment – Early Pregnancy/Obstetrics
Assignment Prompt
Early Pregnancy/Obstetrics
A 20 year-old G1P0A0 female presents to your clinic complaining of crampy lower abdominal pain and spotting. She states her last period was 5 weeks ago, she took a home pregnancy test yesterday and it was positive. She states she tried to make an OB appointment but they could not get her in for several weeks. What questions would you ask this patient? Describe how you would assess and treat this patient using evidence-based practice. Submissions should be in APA format and should include an introduction/conclusion. Review the rubric carefully before submitting.
Expectations
Research: Citations required
Length: 500 words, not including references
Citations: At least two high-level scholarly references in APA from within the last 5 years
Categories
building a just and inclusive community
NC State University is committed to building a just and inclusive community, one that does not tolerate unjust or inhumane treatment, and that denounces it, clearly and loudly. Please describe what those words mean to you and how you will contribute to a more diverse and inclusive NC State environment?
That’s the question to my admission essay , am a black student / girl of color so write this considering that fact please and thank you
Categories
DISCUSSION 4
Discussion Prompt
Telemedicine
Reflect on your experience with using telemedicine. (If you have not used telemedicine discuss the benefits and how it can improve patient outcomes.) How did telemedicine change the access of care to the patient being cared for?
Resources
Medicare Fact Sheet:
https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicare-telemedicine-health-care-provider-fact-sheet
Telehealth Implications:
https://www.npjournal.org/article/S1555-4155(17)30808-5/pdf
Telehealth Billing:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lRkSkxSCls26hfGyBDIWZiO7NQE8crVx/view
Expectations
Initial Post:
Length: A minimum of 275 words, not including references
Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years
Categories
DISCUSSION 4
Discussion Prompt
Contraception
A 17 year-old sexually active female presents to your clinic and reports that she is interested in starting birth control. Briefly discuss at least THREE birth control options and be sure to mention the pros/cons/indications/contraindications for each method.
Expectations
Initial Post:
Length: A minimum of 275 words, not including references
Citations: At least one high-level scholarly reference in APA from within the last 5 years
Categories
leadership
Attend a unit management meeting and analyze the effectiveness of leadership.
Utilize the leadership skills and management functions inherent in organizational, interpersonal, and group communication.
Assess the effectiveness of the meeting and leader.
Criteria Ratings
PAPER (70%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout.
Satisfactory (75-79)
Identifies a topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the paper is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper.
Good (80-89)
Identifies a relevant topic and paper provides adequate direction for the paper with some degree of interest for the reader. The paper states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part.
Excellent (90-100)
Identifies a relevant research topic and a thesis that provides direction for the paper that is engaging and thought provoking. The paper clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistent with the focal point throughout the paper.
Content (40%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
The paper’s purpose is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed.
Satisfactory (75-79)
Information provides minimal support for the topic. Reader shows very little insight.
Good (80-89)
Information provides reasonable support for topic and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights
Excellent (90-100)
Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights.
Data Collection Techniques & Use of Data (15%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
An explanation of data collection techniques is not present. A description of how data collected from interview will be used is not present.
Satisfactory (75-79)
An explanation of data collection techniques is included but lacks supporting details. A description of how data collected from interview will be used is included but lacks supporting details.
Good (80-89)
An explanation of data collection techniques is complete and includes supporting details. A description of how data collected from the interview will be used is complete and includes supporting details.
Excellent (90-100)
An explanation of data collection techniques is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details. A description of how data collected from the interview will be used is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
ORGANIZATION AND EFFECTIVENESS (15%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Satisfactory (75-79)
Paper is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Good (80-89)
Paper is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Paper is descriptive and reflective of the topic and appropriate to the purpose.
Excellent (90-100)
Paper is comprehensive and contains the essence of the topic. Introductory statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Logic and Construction (5%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
Paper is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the purpose. Paper is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Satisfactory (75-79)
Techniques of research are minimally evident. The transition of progression throughout the paper is not smooth and choppy.
Good (80-89)
Techniques of research are evident. There is a smooth progression of format from introduction to conclusion.
Excellent (90-100)
Clear and convincing detail that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) (5%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Satisfactory (75-79)
Mechanical errors are very evident and numerous typos are present and distracting to the reader. Sentence structures are incomplete.
Good (80-89)
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Excellent (90-100)
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
FORMAT (15%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
APA 7 is not used appropriately, or format is rarely followed correctly.
Satisfactory (75-79)
APA 7 is minimally evident. There are multiple formatting errors.
Good (80-89)
APA 7 is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present
Excellent (90-100)
All APA 7 formats elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) (10%)
view longer description
Unsatisfactory (0-74)
Sources are not documented.
Satisfactory (75-79)
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (80-89)
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (90-100)
All sources are documented appropriately. Formatting is correct.