Category: Ethics

The argument that was approved is:
1. If getting vaccinated against Covid-19 produces the most overall happiness, then getting vaccinated against Covid-19 is morally right.
2. Getting vaccinated against Covid-19 produces the most overall happiness.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Therefore, getting vaccinated against Covid-19 is morally right.
You are supposed to defend this argument with the Utilitarian theory.

For this first part of the project, you will create a FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) sheet highlighting Utilitarianism and Ethical Egoism, two of the most well-known ethical theories. A FAQ sheet is a document that compiles a collection of information in the form of questions with their applicable answers.
The goal of this sheet will be to provide some foundational information to the participants that they can take with them as they move through the Diversity Fair.
It also works as a good conversational starter, as people who visit your booth will be covering various aspects of ethics.
You will need to establish a FAQ document and provide the following questions with their applicable answers.
What are ethics?
Why do ethics vary from person to person?
What are the key features of consequentialist theories?
What are the key features of utilitarianism?
What are the critical features of ethical egoism?
What are the differences between utilitarianism and ethical egoism?

Write a persuassive essay on the legalization of Abortion. I chose a prochoice stance. The introduction should have a hook and a strong thesis statement. Also ensure you use current case determined by the Court legalizing a decision to terminate pregnancy as your supportive issue. Make this essay have a counterargument and reburt and conclusion.

Please see attachment and read
I will also send the ethics ebook info to cite from as well
Goes to Turnitin as well
I am a female student in the US
Thanks for your help

Discuss theorists and their contribution(s) to healthcare.
Course Outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
HA405-1: Examine foundational ethical concepts in healthcare.
GEL-1.03: Demonstrate college-level communication through the oral delivery of original materials in Standard English.
Instructions:
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your knowledge of a theorist who has significantly contributed to the field of ethics in health care, within an informational oral presentation. This will be accomplished by developing either an audio or video recording on your selected theorist. Using the viewpoint of a healthcare administrator, it should be informational beyond a biography of someone, and you will demonstrate how their ideologies have contributed to the development of ethics in health care. Likewise, you will explore how your selected theorists’ contributions may impact the future of ethics in health care. Include three (3) academic references and submit your assignment in APA format.
Organize your submission as follows:
A brief (maximum 3 minute) oral overview of your selected theorist.
Details of their theory.
Significant contributions to the field of healthcare.
Give at least one example of how you would apply the contribution of their theory with current health care dilemmas.
At least three (3) credible and scholarly references to support your assertions.
Ensure that your viewpoint and purpose are clearly established.
Ensure your oral delivery techniques, including word choice and oral expressiveness, display exceptional content, organization, and style, while leading the audience to a dynamic and supported conclusion.
Assignment requirements and methods:
Options to record include (but are not limited to) your computer (PC or Mac), Screencastify, PowerPoint, or using an app of your choice on a smartphone or tablet.
Submit your informational oral presentation recording link or file to the Dropbox along with your title and APA formatted references you used to support your oral presentation.
Your tone should be upbeat and professional. Use proper grammar and no slang.

Answer the questions on Pg. 21 of Kretchmar’s course text, PPSPA.
Additionally, please ‘calculate’ your Philosophic Readiness Quotient, found in the Philosophic Exercise that begins on Pg. 5.
Respond to these questions and outline the results of your PRQ in a separate document.

Introduction:
Introduction to the case/moral issue
The controversial debates on the issue
Moral Reasoning/Analysis:
Explain and apply 2 moral theories to the case
Conclusion:
Clearly state your moral stance with justifications
Suggestions/solutions to the issue

Consider that you are a sustainability consultant for a company of your choice and that you have to assess the company’s ethical culture and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) practices. Then you have to formulate concrete suggestions for Sustainability initiatives contributing selected SDGs. You will have to submit a report between 1,100-1,500 words double spaced.
You may consider questioning the following:
• What does a meaningful engagement by business with the SDGs consist of?
• What does aligning the company’s activities to the SDGs mean? And how can we ensure that this does not just become another branding exercise and actually contributes to change?
• In the hope of encouraging new thinking and new action, what can I suggest for the company to start making a more meaningful contribution to delivering the SDGs?
• What is the impact of covid-19 pandemic and current crises on corporate social responsibility? How did organizations change their priorities? How are they reimagining their social responsibility?

Briefly summarize the book, THE DISTANCE BETWEEN US. In your essay, respond to the following questions:
1. Describe the hardships Reyna, Mago, and Carlos face growing up in Iguala.
2. Why does Reyna’s mother, Juana, return alone from the United States? How does life change for Reyna, Mago, and Carlos when she returns?
3. Compare and contrast Mago’s and Reyna’s feelings toward their mother as time after time she chooses her own needs over those of her children. Does she love her children? Use evidence from the text to support your response.
4. Reyna’s father returns from the United States after an eight-year absence. Why does he return?
5. Compare and contrast the ways in which Reyna, Mago, and Carlos deal with the on-again, off-again relationships with their parents? What accounts for their different responses?
6. Reyna attends school in both Mexico and the United States. Compare and contrast her experiences in both places.
7. Reyna does not speak English when she enters school in the United States. How does she overcome this challenge? How is she received by her teachers? By her classmates? What accounts for her ability to succeed?
8. As Reyna matures into a young woman, how does she resolve her feelings of being abandoned by both her mother and father? Does she view one parent as having been better than the other? Why or why not?
9. To whom does Reyna owe thanks for her success? Why? Do you agree or disagree and why?
10. Add your concluding comments/thoughts
**Please note: you MUST provide evidence from the book to support whatever answers you provide in your essay. What statements from the book support your position? In order to get the maximum points possible, facts (quotes/evidence from the book) are required. You may use additional sources; however, THE DISTANCE BETWEEN US must be your primary source of information used for analysis.
You MUST include an introductory statement (a paragraph or two in length) which includes a THESIS STATEMENT that explains what you will be discussing in your paper.
Font size – NO LARGER THAN 12 Point.
Citations – you MUST use MLA formatted citations.

Write a persuassive essay on Abortion. My stance is Pro Choice, I want the essay to support ligalization of abortion on grounds of pro-choice. Introduction should have a powerful hook and a strong thesis statement. Borrow from philosophers like Judith Jarvis and the like who supporited abortion. Also include a counterargument and reburt it. the conclusion should be strong and show why your point matter.